[ecasound] Bug report: etm consumes too much CPU

From: S. Massy <lists@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sun May 20 2012 - 05:51:42 EEST


Within the context of investigating ways to perform latency compensation
in nama, I ran the following test. I created a chain setup with a
hundred chains with rtnull at either end and a delay op on each,
either etd or etm. With etd, I only get a slight overhead (about 3% on
my 2.26ghz dual-core processor), while etm goes right through the roof
and has tonnes of xruns. I figure that can't be right. Please find the
test ecs files attached.



Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/

Ecasound-list mailing list

Received on Sun May 20 08:15:01 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun May 20 2012 - 08:15:01 EEST