Subject: -t: at 48000
From: Jeremy Hall (jhall_AT_maoz.com)
Date: Wed May 14 2003 - 00:53:43 EEST
I ran with current CVS of say a week or so ago, maybe a bit longer, after
the release, and specified -t:nnn.
my aio-objects were at 48 instead of 44.1. ecasound stopped short and I'm
wondering if it is because it didn't use the right rate when computing
frames_per_second for the -t parameter.
let me know if you want more details
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed May 14 2003 - 00:51:39 EEST