Subject: Re: [ecasound] problem with ecasound 2.2.1
From: Junichi Uekawa (dancer_AT_netfort.gr.jp)
Date: Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:26:17 EET
> I'd say "eck-uh-sound" is the closest one (at least closest to the way I
> pronounce it ;)). Another way to describe this is to start from
> "megasound", and omit pronouncing the 'm' at start, and replace 'g' with a
> sharper 'k' sound.
Hmm... I've been calling it
"ee. see. aye sound" for the last two (or three?) years...
and I've believed that it came from -eca (the effect command-line
option), which I personally found to be the most useful
effect in ecasound.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:27:17 EET