Subject: Re: [ecasound] XML solution experience
From: Bill Allen (ballen_AT_mail.serve.com)
Date: Wed Nov 07 2001 - 20:29:28 EET
It is a very interesting and clever approach to using xml with ecasound.
My question is (and this is a request for information, not a veiled
critique), what are the advantages of an xml-based ecasound driver vs.
using ecs files? My largest project to date has been 6 tracks and this
might have something to do with my question.
655 files! That is a ton of work.
On 7 Nov 2001, Alban Peignier wrote:
> For a long time, I'm looking for solutions to realize a larg multi-track
> mix ... I've just found a solution which combines ecasound with xml
> files. It's too long to describe correctly in a small mail, so I've
> quickly wrote this document : http://tryphon.homeip.net/~alban/xmlsound/
> I hope that this solution will help somebody else ;) All your comments
> are welcome.
> To unsubscribe send message 'unsubscribe' in the body of the
> message to <ecasound-list-request_AT_wakkanet.fi>.
-- To unsubscribe send message 'unsubscribe' in the body of the message to <ecasound-list-request_AT_wakkanet.fi>.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 20:18:58 EET