Subject: Re: [ecasound] s32_le in ecasound
From: Jeremy Hall (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Jul 17 2001 - 16:54:29 EEST
possibly, but I'll bet you find the -erc approach much cleaner since you
aren't clocking incorrectly. We need an avg thingie I guess.
In the new year, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> Yer right, I meant -etf:35 - the perils of cut&paste. I'll give -erc a
> try and see if that gives any advantage - I think the end result is the
> On 17 Jul 2001 06:59:32 -0400, Jeremy Hall wrote:
> > OH THAT'S HIDEOUS!
> > try using -erc to fix your stereo problems, I just looked in the
> > manpage. I don't see the etf effect as having more than 1 parameter, maybe
> > my ecasound.1 is out of date?
> > _J
> > In the new year, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> > > You need to specify what format the input is in and then what the output
> > > is required to be for the conversion
> > >
> > > e.g., record as a 44100 mono stream, convert to fake stereo and mp3 it:
> > > ecasound -f:s16_le,2,22050 -i:rage.raw -etf:35,surround,20
> > > -f:s16_le,2,44100 -o:stdout|bladeenc -rawstereo stdin rage.mp3
> > >
> > > In this case, its recoreded at 44100, but when I need a stereo output, I
> > > had to halve the input rate. Experiment!!
> > >
> > > BillK
> > >
> To unsubscribe send message 'unsubscribe' in the body of the
> message to <firstname.lastname@example.org>.
-- To unsubscribe send message 'unsubscribe' in the body of the message to <email@example.com>.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Jul 17 2001 - 16:54:21 EEST