Subject: Re: [ecasound] CVS-tree updated to 'this-might-be-2.0.0' :)
From: Junichi Uekawa (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Apr 29 2001 - 15:28:11 EEST
Kai Vehmanen <email@example.com> cum veritate scripsit:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > I'm now trying to compile it. There is a small glitch in that it doesn't
> > seem to be compiling on my environment now.
> Any other problems than ALSA?
It seems to be doing quite well. I have uploaded to unstable a version of ecasound labeled
1.9dev7.cvs20010428-1 (I think this is clear enough)
For the deb packages, you can find it in the Debian archives,
for example, http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/ecasound/
has qtecasound and ecawave, respectively.
> > Debian packaging of ALSA is completely broken at the moment, it seems. The
> > Debian unstable distribution is in the process of moving over from 0.5.10
> > to 0.9 series, and there is no usable ALSA environment at the moment. Oh
> > well...
> Hmm, ecasound should compile fine against both trees. Only if you have
> a mixer environment (both 0.5 and newer ALSA stuff), or a old 0.6.x/0.9.x
> ALSA version, the compile can fail.
Neither tree is currently available. Not much I can do, but wait until things settle down a bit. It is in a transition period now.
I tried to install libasound1-dev (the development library of ALSA) and it pulled in a mixture of 0.5 and 0.9 ;(
It should be fixed soon.
-- firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GE d+ s:- a-- C+ UL++++ P- L+++ E W++ N o-- K- w++ O- M- V-- PS+ PE-- Y+ PGP+ t-- 5 X-- R* tv- b+ DI- D++ G e h* r% !y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-- To unsubscribe send message 'unsubscribe' in the body of the message to <email@example.com>.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Apr 29 2001 - 15:39:59 EEST