Subject: Re: [ecasound] Re: ecasound latency (fwd)
From: Jeremy Hall (jhall@UU.NET )
Date: Fri Jan 21 2000 - 17:10:03 EET
oh that's bril. so I have to use rtnull so that all my tracks are synched?
In the new year, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Jeremy Hall wrote:
> >> In this case, number of tracks doesn't affect latency. Basicly,
> > so this is an improvement on ecasound5?
> Well, actually no. This has been the case ever since I added support
> for multiple chains. If there are no realtime device in the
> chainsetup, only then the number of tracks starts to slow things down.
> Kai Vehmanen <firstname.lastname@example.org> -------- CS, University of Turku, Finland
> . http://www.wakkanet.fi/ecasound/ - linux multitrack audio processing
> . http://www.wakkanet.fi/sculpscape/ - ambient-idm-rock-... mp3/ra/wav
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Fri Jan 21 2000 - 17:11:28 EET