Re: [ecasound] using mpg123 and lame

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [ecasound] using mpg123 and lame
From: Jeremy Hall (jhall@uu.net )
Date: Fri Dec 17 1999 - 14:19:14 EET


well I since have found .59r and things got a LOT better.

Later versions of lame are improving both speed and efficiency, so you
might want to look at the newer versions.

_J

Kai Vehmanen said:
> On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Jeremy Hall wrote:
>
> > Version 0.59o (1998/Feb/08). Written and copyrights by Michael Hipp.
> [...]
> > and it does not like live streams produced by lame. Since you people want
> > to use mpg123 and lame in combination with ecasound, have you seen
> > problems with this combination? Lame is 3.57
>
> Hmm, I'm using mpg123 0.59r and lame 3.12 with no problems. What
> you mean by 'doesn't like'? Errors, distortion, ...?
>
> --
> Kai Vehmanen <kaiv@wakkanet.fi> -------- CS, University of Turku, Finland
> . http://www.wakkanet.fi/ecasound/ - linux audio processing
> . http://www.wakkanet.fi/sculpscape/ - ambient-idm-rock-... mp3/ra/wav
>


New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Mon Dec 27 1999 - 15:50:38 EET